Can some one help me what kind of axles,auto transmmison,t case i have?It is a 2000 f150 lariet 4x4 with the 5.4
Thanks  

I’m davidjr92 but i deleted my account on accident while checking my email will this thread be erased.  

i have a 2001 xlt lariat you have  a borg warner 4406 transfer case and a 9.75 rearend  

ok thanks is there any way i check and make sure thats what i have

Thanks  

Ok i know what trans, tcase, and motor i have but can some what kind of axles come on a 2000 f150 lariet 4x4  

Rear axle is a 9.75 and the front is still a Dana44  

Shouldn't that be an 8.8 IFS front center section? I'm pretty sure Ford never used a Dana 44 center section on the SLA trucks.  

the front axle is the 8.8 IFS and the rear the 9.75  

hav24wheel:
the front axle is the 8.8 IFS and the rear the 9.75

It is not IFS as it is nothing more than a D44 with a hinge in the middle. It is not a IFS suspension.  

Dude... Sno... 2000 Ford F-150's were NOT TTB, they were SLA.

And YES, TTB and TIB are both INDEPENDENT Front Suspension systems.

I will admit that you know A LOT of stuff, but it would seem that you know jack about how a TTB suspension works.  

everybody!... take cover!

 

Everyone UP-ARMOUR! This is about to get interesting! Hey Mud, I got some 1/2" Titanium plate if you need it!! HA!!  

Actually, wouldn't any axle configuration, short of a solid axle, be considered a IFS, no mater what the manafacturer called it? Just wonderin. Also why come we can't get solid axle configurations in the States anymore on some models, at least as an option? My cousin in Germany, bought a 2008 Ford Ranger off the showroom floor with 4 doors and solid front axle standard. He said if you whant IFS there you have to order it. Why do all the other countries get the good stuff from manufacturers?  

Jungleboy4:
Actually, wouldn't any axle configuration, short of a solid axle, be considered a IFS, no mater what the manafacturer called it? Just wonderin. Also why come we can't get solid axle configurations in the States anymore on some models, at least as an option? My cousin in Germany, bought a 2008 Ford Ranger off the showroom floor with 4 doors and solid front axle standard. He said if you whant IFS there you have to order it. Why do all the other countries get the good stuff from manufacturers?

With IFS you either have two control arms (usually unequal length too) attached to spindle/hub/knuckle or a strut with a lower control arm. The net result of this is that tire/wheel can articulate with minimal changes in camber angles and track width. With a swing axle (like a TTB) you basically have a axle with a hinge in middle that as it flexes causes big changes in chamber angles and tread/track width (especially the track width on extension) which results in funky handling and accelerated tread wear too.  

Dude... you're still WRONG. There is NOTHING the same about a swing axle and TTB/TIB... Guess we're going to need a lesson in TTB...